Skip to main content

Publications

Although the U.S. economy overall continues its expansion following the Great Recession and associated financial crisis, the recovery can look very different from state to state. The lion’s share of economic gains are not only concentrated at the top of the income and wealth distribution, but also in a small share of regions. While some parts of the country have surged ahead, millions of Americans in urban and rural communities are still waiting for their wages to start rising again and struggling to make ends meet.
Over the last 18 months, the Trump administration and Congressional Republicans have turned their backs on rural Americans. While the poverty rate in rural areas is more than 3 percentage points higher than in metropolitan areas, Republicans have avoided addressing the economic challenges facing rural communities. Rather than put forth real solutions, Republicans worked to strip health care coverage for rural families, endanger farm household incomes, and take away nutrition assistance for the neediest of families.
The tables and graphics in this chart book are detailed state-by-state analysis of data and topics found in JEC Dems “Investing in Rural America” report. These graphics provide quick figures on urban, rural, and statewide numbers, highlighting the complexity of metropolitan and nonmetropolitan areas.
American workers continue to wait for the raises they were promised as part of the Republican tax law. The average hourly wage for production and nonsupervisory workers was lower in May 2018 than it was in May 2017, after adjusting for inflation. Wage growth for most workers remains weak and now that inflation is starting to pick up, wages are barely keeping pace with the growing cost of living. This comes on top of decades of stagnating wages for most workers.
It was inevitable that there would be unintended consequences from the GOP tax law. Debate and input were limited and the plan changed rapidly, barely giving nonpartisan experts any time to think through its impact. Now that the law has taken effect we are starting to see more and more of those unintended harms. Just this week, the Wall Street Journal reported how bank holdings of municipal bonds dropped for the first time since the recession, due to the new tax law leading to less demand.
This fact sheet provides a snapshot of the current economic state of women in the United States. It includes measures of economic well-being, such as income and poverty rates, as well as data on educational attainment, labor force participation, and health insurance rates. Together, these measures help paint a portrait of women’s economic health in 2018.
President Trump is right to praise the health of the labor market, but the current low level of unemployment is the result of an expansion spanning nearly a decade, not policy changes made six months ago. After the worst recession since the Great Depression, the United States has consistently added jobs every month since September 2010. The pace of job creation has slowed since President Trump took office though. In his first 16 full months in office, the economy has added an average of 185,000 jobs per month, compared with 205,000 per month in the last 16 full months of President Obama’s tenure.
Over the last few years, the Federal Reserve (Fed) has steadily increased the federal funds rate, usually by 25 basis points. These increases ultimately lead to higher interest rates on a variety of financial products, from student loans to home mortgages. With the Fed poised to raise interest rates another two or three times this year, consumers are starting to see the impacts of higher rates materialize.
Many families are still suffering from the large financial setbacks of the Great Recession. New research from the Federal Reserve of St. Louis highlights the ongoing financial struggle families headed by different age cohorts face as they attempt to regain wealth and income lost during this period. Families headed by those born after the 1960s, for example, have been unable to fully regain income lost during the Great Recession by the end of 2016. The youngest families studied, headed by those born during the 1980s, have fallen furthest behind in the typical wealth-accumulation life cycle, leaving them with limited income growth compared to other families. In spite of suffering losses during the Great Recession, though, families headed by someone born in the 1930s through the 1950s were able to rebuild wealth and regain income by 2016.